Hugh McGuire

An Open Approach to Scholarly Reading and Knowledge Management

In 2017, The Rebus Foundation embarked on a research and development project to prototype an open, web-based reading system, with funding from the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation.
Our main goals with this project were to clearly identify and understand the different players involved in the publication, distribution and consumption of scholarly monographs, and to explore how Open Web technologies could improve scholars’ access to, and interaction with, scholarly monographs. We've summarized our research findings in this report.
Visit rebus.foundation to learn more about the Rebus Foundation and our projects. You can also contact us at hi@rebus.foundation.
80 printed pages
Have you already read it? How did you like it?
👍👎

Impressions

  • vvxshared an impression7 years ago
    🔮Hidden Depths
    💡Learnt A Lot
    🎯Worthwhile
    🚀Unputdownable

    Полезный обзор для всех, кто занимается академическим книгоизданием, библиотечным делом и IT-разработкой в этой сфере. Да и просто про чтение интересно и полезно.

Quotes

  • Kirill Perepechkinhas quoted6 years ago
    While our research has been driven by particular interest is in developing a networked, web-based reading platform (with HTML as the base format), it is clear that PDF is currently the preferred digital format for many scholarly readers, largely because of two factors: portability and searchability.
  • vvxhas quoted7 years ago
    Another respondent noted that they use a “combination of apps which have varying degrees of features and accessibility—Zotero, Onenote, Foxit, Docear, Qiqqa.”
  • vvxhas quoted7 years ago
    This lack of separation between reading and writing is unique to scholarly reading, making it very different from leisure reading. One of our interviewees explained the reason for this inseparability between reading and writing:
fb2epub
Drag & drop your files (not more than 5 at once)